jennifer lopez twins gucci ads

images tattoo jennifer lopez kids

for Gucci#39;s ad campaign.

priderock

05-15 11:20 AM

May be he is trying to get some more money from you or even worse try to sell your labor to the highest bidder ??

Talk to him !! Some thing really fishy...

---

wallpaper for Gucci#39;s ad campaign.

2011 Jennifer lopez by Mert

pd_recapturing

04-07 02:33 PM

Guys, Please do not ridicule saralayar. he has raised a very valid point. We are so involved with the GC issue that we are not able to think beyond that. I do agree with the fact that IV is so preoccupoed with GC crisis that there is no point (or bandwidth) to raise citizenship issue. I have seen so many of my friends who came with me in US 8 years ago and are citizens by now but I am still struggling with GC with no hope in site. Sometime, I think, by the time, I will get GC (if I), they will become sr citizen :) it feels very bad but cant help it.

---

Home middot; About middot; ← 2011

needhelp!

04-08 06:52 PM

Thanks santb1975 & NolaIndian for creating this. I am going to ask a friend who ran half marathon last year. I am still contemplating whether I will be able to keep the commitment, since the only exercise I do is walk to and from my car :D

texanmom, that was sneaky signing up hubby for a marathon while we borrowed him for another IV marathon of sorts!

---

2011 2011 Jennifer lopez by Mert

Alsogucci unveils advertising

amitjoey

12-13 01:53 PM

got two more who will register by eod

Thanks, way to go!!

---

more...

Jennifer Lopez#39;s adorable

neelu

12-13 01:42 PM

I just sent another email to friends, inviting them to Join IV. Please raise awareness amongst your friends.


Thank you, AmitJoey.
I am sure you will post as soon as they respond with a 'Yes'. :)

---

The ad was shot in Malibu this

franklin

06-14 11:03 AM

I am appalled at the insensitivity and selfishness of some of the posters here.

Those of you who have just had good news yesterday that YOU are ok should be ASHAMED of yourselves by telling people in a much more depressing situation to lighten up.:confused:

---

more...

jennifer lopez twins gucci ads

chunky

09-22 02:17 PM

Does anyone know tatkal fee for CGI Houston.
I am sending my passport by mail.
On one page it is written $90 but on remaining it is $150.

i see some posts with $90.
Does anyone know if there is fee increase of $90 is still valid

With IKE striking in Texas , cgihouston dot org says "we will be able to provide only essential/emergency consular services until normalcy is restored."

I need to send my passport for renewal, i was thinking if i should wait for some time or send it right away

What you guys suggest ? Anyone else on the same boat ?


PSA

---

2010 Home middot; About middot; ← 2011

tattoo jennifer lopez kids

bugsbunny

05-06 12:24 AM

Yes sir even I did my F1 process from INDIA by myself.

Impressive! What's your field if you don't mind me asking.

---

more...

lopez twins gucci.

mundakamal

05-15 09:49 AM

Can i file it myself ? i did talk to a lawyer and she said we need a document from a company saying that the position is still open before we can file I485 by myself.

Thanks

---

hair Alsogucci unveils advertising

Gucci, beauty | celebrity

pappu

01-31 03:02 PM

Thank you for registering with Immigration Voice for the advocacy efforts in Washington DC. Your participation in such efforts will help tremendously in bringing about the positive changes we seek.


Situation Room for the event
Washington Court Hotel
525 New Jersey Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20001

Maps for reference:
1. Buildings 1, 2, 3 and 8, 9, 10 are the ones we will be visiting. (http://www.aoc.gov/cc/images/Visiting_Capitol_Map_legend.jpg)
2. Situation Room and Legislative office buildings. (http://maps.google.com/maps?f=d&source=s_d&saddr=Washington+Court+Hotel,+Washington,+DC&daddr=Longworth+House+Office+Building,+Independenc e+Avenue+Southwest,+Washington+D.C.,+DC&geocode=FaODUQIdY-Ro-yG7bOSMrwDdqQ%3BFQFgUQIdRvFo-ymb9gYkKri3iTHBQQ_MBb8dGw&hl=en&mra=ls&sll=38.890381,-77.008903&sspn=0.010121,0.025105&ie=UTF8&ll=38.892102,-77.008753&spn=0.010121,0.025105&z=16)
3. Airport Distances from the Situation Room (http://maps.google.com/maps?f=d&source=s_d&saddr=525+New+Jersey+Avenue,+NW,+Washington,+DC+20 001+(Washington+Court+Hotel)&daddr=2605+S+Clark+St,+Arlington,+VA+22202+(Ronald +Reagan+National+Airport)+to:Dulles+Airport,+Dulle s,+VA+to:Baltimore+Airport,+Baltimore,+MD&geocode=FaODUQIdY-Ro-yG7bOSMrwDdqQ%3BFRHLUAIdYHBo-yGtawdtAa9oQQ%3BFaVhUgId4D1i-ymlvtd-Ske2iTFUkDGRJ71SzA%3BFanVVQIdTSBu-ykL4MK7_OK3iTFAF5f6DBUAAA&hl=en&mra=pd&sll=39.027719,-77.067719&sspn=0.605958,1.693268&ie=UTF8&ll=39.04052,-77.060852&spn=0.605848,1.693268&z=10)

Hotel Options
1. Priceline bidding on Hotels as low as $60/night (http://travela.priceline.com/hotels/?plf=pcln)
2. Air Bed & Breakfast - staying with locals. (http://www.airbnb.com/?af=73699&c=Airbnb&gclid=COGT2KTN7acCFc885QodeBLCbg)

Dress Code
Tie and/or Jacket for Meetings and Congressional Reception - Monday, Apr 4th and Tuesday, Apr 5th

Parking Issues
Saturday, Sunday parking on the street is free.
Parking in the hotel costs $30/day

Have Questions?
Call 202-386-6250
If you were unable to attend the conference call, please contact me.

---

more...

JENNIFER Lopez and her twins

santb1975

04-08 02:07 PM

^^

---

hot Jennifer Lopez#39;s adorable

jennifer lopez advertising

bitzbytz

03-27 10:26 AM

With this attitude and arrogance, I rarely think there would be motivation for anyone to do anything for IV.

I started discussion by asking , how can IV convince me that my donation is going to help, I got shot down by ARROGANT ******** and got all reds as if I care. I was planning on a charity/donation drive of my own to get some money for IV.
Know lot of consultants, who really dont know what to do with their miles with every one a executive airline status.
Already have 10+ people pledging Poker tournament from my poker group with their miles for Airlines and hotels. We are talking of a Million AA miles.
Indian restaurants(s) having a Immigration week where a dollar of each bill be given to IV.
I was even thinking of standing at Indian stores in Dallas to ask people to consider for IV cause, as long as I believed and hence was asking.

I was just getting started with so many ideas for my free time.

Good luck in what ever you do guys. Note that GC is not everything and note that I am still on extended H1, family on H1 and EAD never helped me. so assumption that EAD helped my life is baseless. All these hypocrites are long gone from IV once they get GC. All we get is response that Mr X or Y , even after getting GC, is working fro cause. How can I believe.

Any organization can be successful if there are questions answered and not shot down. Just working at DC doesnt make some one a strong contributor for IV.Work at grass root level is so imp. What I have noticed is any one who went to DC has become headstrong, egoist and arrogant as if they own IV.


Please read my initial post before commenting. I always said, I am for IV cause. just convince me so that I can convince some one

Gisa pita dialogue,...dont ask what IV has done,, ask yourself what you have done... COMMON

Here it is, I can write in BOLD and RED

---

more...


house house Jennifer Lopez is a

Jennifer Lopez TOUS Jewelry ad

BharatPremi

09-25 10:05 PM

Yeah, go ahead and request that.
Banning me is not the solution to your problems amigo.
You guys (EB3-I) need to understand that "sympathy" is NOT a tenable legal position.
Law is law, rules are rules.
You cannot be planning to tramp all over patiently waiting EB2-I folks and expect to get away with it. Of course, I and probably several other people will undertake all legal efforts required to fight this (illegal) request from EB3-I.

To the guy who lectured me on how great his experience was etc: I obtained my Masters in Mechanical Engg from Stanford. Of course, I am not going to tell you where I work and what I earn. You can speculate all you want about my "Skillz".

To the guy who assured me that I am sinning and God will punish me: No, I don't think so. Fighting for the truth, and trying to fight for and protect my legal rights is not a sin. Speaking the truth is not a sin. I did not make EB1/EB2/EB3 categories. The government did. I did not screw people to have them apply in EB3, they should have known better.

To the guys who say EB2-I folks do not care about them: OF COURSE they don't, you guys (EB3-I) are trying EVERY TRICK IN THE BOOK to have an advantage at our cost. This shall not stand.

To anyone from the EB3-I cabal who wishes to engage with me: Try, and I will debate your points, any subject, any time (no IT please, I don't work in that miserable industry), regarding what is legal and good for EB3-I and also what is illegal and bad (mostly for EB2-I).

Behind every visa number, is a person and most probably a family. Children. Parents. Spouses. Siblings. DO NOT preach to me that I don't know about the suffering. We each have our own suffering. I have mine. Unfortunately, I wish my suffering just involved my GC.

Do you really think that whatever frustrations poured down here by whomsoever will force USCIS to change mind or its operational procedures changed? If not then why are you screaming so intensively? If this is the level one can achieve after joining Standford then we should now starting to doubt about the real quality level of Standford. But do not worry we will not judge Standford based on your behaviour here.

People are pouring down their frustrations, ideas and possible solutions. One may be agree or disagree for a particular post/idea but upon disagreement no one should become uncivil.

---

tattoo The ad was shot in Malibu this

J. Lo with her twins Max and

sk123

09-02 07:17 PM

I am in same boat. Was your case transferred to EAC and then came back to TSC?

I think its one time transfer to TSC.

---

more...


pictures jennifer lopez twins gucci ads

Jennifer Lopez and her

pappu

04-18 10:08 AM

After doing a conference call this weekend, we think we should close this thread. There are not enough people for us to consider a large public campaign. However this does not mean IV is not and will not be working on this fix. This fix has been a very important fix for IV for several years and we have it in our legislative and admin fixes agenda. Those that came for the recent advocacy day event know that it is a key provision that relates to our quality of life concern. Every other legislative fix we are trying is also tied to I485 filing. We advocated for this fix in our just concluded advocacy days and will continue to do so in every opportunity we get. The purpose of this thread was misunderstood and people thought IV will only work on this fix if there are 5000 votes.
We were at the time of starting this thread considering a possibility of launching a campaign like http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/forum16-iv-agenda-and-legislative-updates/17157-deadline-march-1st-target-25000-letters-can-we-make-it-happen.html when the timing was right.

In past similar IV campiagns, some people even got responses like http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/forum16-iv-agenda-and-legislative-updates/18067-admin-fix-letter-response-from-cis-wh.html
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/forum16-iv-agenda-and-legislative-updates/18200-letter-from-uscis-after-sending-letter-to-president.html

For a campaign like that to succeed the number has to be way higher than what we achieved in 2008. Again just writing letters will not do anything. You need a big organization like IV behind it where we take all these letters with us for the meeting. We also need a strong ongoing advocacy effort in DC though lobbying.

Another point to be noted for all people wanting to file I485 is not to think narrowly about your own I485 application. It will be counter productive to your own cause and the overall effort we are trying to do. This also applies to people who have filed I485 and do not wish others to be able to file I485 because their own application might be delayed or some other reasons ( Here is one past example . Many posts on this thread and many such divisive threads are deleted because they were too offensive but you will get an idea http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/forum14-members-forum/2714-why-are-we-suddenly-obsessed-with-uscis-efficiency.html ) . We are going to adopt a zero tolerance policy to such people when we come across. People who think narrowly about their own I485 application and fail to understand the full picture of the EB backlog should not be part of this effort. It is better to not respond to such people and lose such people from this effort rather than trying to be all inclusive. We cannot waste our time to either keep such people happy or fight with them. If there are any such narrow minded people for or against this fix, they are free to cancel their recurring contributions and find their own ways to get their I485 fix done or oppose IV's I485 fix effort.

For people who have voted and want to work on this fix, please contact the leaders of this initiative ashwin_27 and starsun. There is a google group where most active members share their views. The entry to the google group is restricted and the leaders will have to speak to each interested person before permitting access. There will also be public action items posted in the coming weeks for everyone that has voted. These action items will also help you to raise awareness of this issue. We are closing this poll at this time so that there is no misunderstanding and people who have voted understand that there is more to getting this fix done than just voting and going away or complaining that nothing is happening.

The thread will be closed in a day or two.

---

dresses jennifer lopez advertising

girlfriend Jennifer Lopez:

nyte_crawler

06-08 06:15 PM

Now that the House and Senate have adopted different versions of immigration legislation, textbook explanations of lawmaking suggest the bill's fate rests in the hands of a conference committee. Congress uses these temporary bicameral panels � which some call the "Third House" of Congress � to resolve differences in competing versions of legislation.
But lawmakers often find exceptions to textbook explanations and immigration reform provides a case in point. True, most predict contentious House-Senate negotiations on the issue. But "where" and "when" are key questions. Creation of a conference committee will be more an indication that a deal is done than a forum to find one. In other words, lawmakers may not even officially create a bicameral negotiating panel until they have found a clear path toward a workable compromise � a process that may take weeks of private, informal discussions before conferees ever formally meet.
Conference committees are not mandatory. They offer one way to resolve differences between chambers, but there is no requirement that lawmakers even use this procedure. According to Walter Oleszek at the CongressionalResearch Service, only 15 to 25 percent of all laws passed by Congress ever reach the conference-committee stage. Lawmakers normally resolve differences either by one house adopting the other's version or by "ping-ponging" measures back and forth until substantive disagreements are ironed out. Conference committees are never formed in either of those cases.
However, Mr. Oleszek also notes that most controversial bills that become law do go through the House-Senate conference process. Immigration definitely clears the divisiveness threshold. But sending a politically charged bill to a formal conference immediately and hoping differences get resolved there is not a tactic preferred by the GOP leadership.
When lawmakers do decide to form a formal conference committee, its procedures are exercised in congressional discretion with only a few set rules and precedents. The House and Senate each choose members drawn heavily from the committees that authored the legislation. In the Senate, the presiding officer appoints from a list developed by the chair and ranking member of the committee that passed the bill. In the House, the speaker appoints all conferees and sometimes draws in members of the leadership. Each house has one vote on issues under consideration in the conference; therefore there is a "House position" and a "Senate position" on any provision in disagreement. Each chamber develops positions based on a majority vote of conferees from that body.
Neither chamber is under any obligation to respond to a request for a conference. And sometimes the bulk of negotiations occur in a pre-conference informal setting. House leaders are averse to sending major legislation to a formal conference with the prospects of long, drawn-out deliberations. For one thing, after a bill goes to conference and there is no resolution in 20 calendar and 10 legislative days, any member of the House can offer non-binding motions on a daily basis, which often subjects the body to tedious, sometimes politically embarrassing votes that eat up valuable time.
Democrat obstructionism in the Senate may also stall efforts to convene a conference. Since losing the majority after the 2002 election, Democrats have made the historically routine process of going to conference (which is normally done through unanimous consent) a procedural jungle. On the immigration measure, Democrats insisted on the unusual step of a pre-agreed ratio of conferees (26 senators total � 14 Republicans and 12 Democrats) before entering into a unanimous consent agreement to finish the bill. Also, because the Senate bill contains a revenue provision, it is subject to a so-called "blue slip," which means it could be automatically rejected by the House. (The Origination Clause of the Constitution requires all revenue measures to begin in the House. A Senate bill containing revenue provisions is sent back with a resolution printed on blue paper, hence the name.) Democrats then objected earlier this week to efforts to attach the Senate immigration bill to a House-passed revenue bill, which would have fixed the problem.
And when it comes to national issues like immigration, the White House also becomes a big investor in this legislative real estate. Thus, the real "conference committee" on immigration reform will take place informally between the White House and a handful of congressional leaders. If these lawmakers see a compromise that can garner strong support among Republicans in the House and Senate, a formal conference will be appointed.
If this path can't be found, it's unlikely lawmakers will ever formally set foot into a conference committee to orchestrate a compromise � in public or private.

---

more...


makeup lopez twins gucci.

house Jennifer Lopez is a

go_gc_way

12-19 10:46 PM

:D

perm2gc,
Instead of bumping it with a " /\/\/\/\/\/\ " , I agree... I wrote a little philosophy there, looks like you did not like it.
Hopefully , we will be able to prioritize it with other members every then and now, to grow our membership to magic 10,000.

---

girlfriend J. Lo with her twins Max and

Jennifer Lopez#39;s Twins Max and

natrajs

09-01 07:03 PM

Congratulations to the IV members who reported approvals today 20090901 :

inskrish - May-04 - TSC :)
Nashim's Co-worker - Nov 2004 - NSC :)
cokeraj - Jun-04 - NSC :)
NolaIndian 32 - 04/30/2004 -TSC :)
GCWhru's Wife - Sep-04 :)
priderock - 10/2004 :)
lotus26 - Sep 2004 :)
srsga - Jun 04 :)
:)

Let's see How tomorrow will fare? :)

Congrats to all , And Best Wishes

Continue your support to IV

---

hairstyles JENNIFER Lopez and her twins

Jennifer Lopez Will Star in a

JazzByTheBay

07-11 11:55 PM

Hopefully your optimism will be well rewarded... .:)

jazz

Honorable Lofgren had brought about very valid points and it seems too good to be true. (pessimism)

But if this is true We are all in, in next few days. (optimism).

The Twist is if this is true chances are H. Lofgren will cut a deal, remember there are heavyweights on the other side too. Its too embarrasing for all of them. ( realism)

I wish my optimism comes true though, that way I can tell my children when they grow up as to who made the difference and stood up for RIGHT CAUSE and questioned WRONG DOING without fear and that would be Hon. Lofgren.

om namo shivay. (Amen)

BTW our life has been between these three "ism" phases for god knows how long. (anantkaal) - time immemorial

---

MeraNoAayega

01-21 09:49 PM

that the current application processing range is 6-10 months after filing. Given the current economic conditions, it would be beneficial to see the application approved rather than worry about delays.

Yes.
1. For perm applications which are not audited the processing time is about 225 days (from perm filed date)
2. For perm applications which are audited the processing time is about 600 days (from perm filed date)

---

marty

04-17 12:32 PM

It's extremely difficult, if not impossible to maintain PR status in both US and Canada due to the residency requirements. Once you get your US GC the best thing to do is to abandon your Canadian PR if you intend to live in the US and make your home here. Frankly I don't see any benefit of mainatining your Canadaian PR. If you try to do that it might even jeopardize your GC. Google and you will find lots of advice on this issue. I plan to live and work here in the US.

Thanks Lasantha. Yes, I have been reading a lot on google about it. Some readers also suggested landing and come back using AVR as I have a valid HIB approval but still I am not feeling comfortable doing it. I guess I will not land there. My whole process until 485 went very smooth, I am in ROW category, and hope all goes well till approval. I am also planning to stay in US.

Damn, this whole thing is giving me headache now :confused:

---